Dear Clive hi. First of
all I would like to thank you for
honoring our site be talking to
us.
A pleasure!
"Smoke
& Mirrors" is your latest
release and I would like to concentrate
on this. Are you satisfied with the
final result? Does it reflect the
feelings you had that time on stage?
Yes, I think this
is a nice recollection of Arena on
stage from that tour. I'm pleased
with the result.
In general,
is "Smoke & Mirrors"
the adequate evidence of Arena on
stage for those who weren't
privileged attending to one of your
shows?
I think it should
give people a pretty good ‘flavour'
of Arena. Of course, you can't
beat the actual live experience.
What improvements
would you do for this release? What
thing would you do better?
I'm not sure.
It's been a while since the
DVD was put together. I guess there
are a few camera angles we could have
improved on…;)
After a year
and more, what do you remember of
that night? Was there something particular
that drew your attention and your
memory captured?
I always enjoy the
warm reception we have received in
Poland. This gig was no exception.
In a way the audience reaction probably
does not come across as clearly as
on the night.
You are experienced
in producing live releases. What are
the differences in your preparation
between a live CD and a live DVD?
Did you approach the DVD production
in the same way and with the usual
concentration?
I like to think we
put the same effort into both type
of product. Naturally there is more
to consider when there is video involved
as well.
What are
the benefits after a live CD or a
DVD, in terms of band's reputation?
What's the aim of a release
like this?
We hope to give people
another insight into Arena. Most people
won't have seen the band live,
so, the aim is to offer a glimpse
of that side of the band.
Do you think
that official live releases fight
off pirate forms of releases, such
as bootlegs?
I don't expect
it does, but at least the buyer knows
that we have ‘approved'
the product.
As a band
you follow the practice of fan-club
CDs. What is the goal behind these
releases, except from awarding your
dedicated fans?
It encouraged people
to be a part of the Fan Club, and
helped to raise revenue for the organization.
It was also a way of offering a slightly
more intimate insight into Arena.
It's
no "new news" to say that
you are considered as the best ambassador
of what we call "neo-prog".
Do you accept this label and this
particular role or at the end this
whole thing doesn't make any
sense?
That's a very
nice accolade for the band, and we
are happy if this is what some people
say. We see ourselves as part of a
larger picture, but we have no problem
with that description.
All of your
releases are under your label. What
lead you to the decision releasing
a DVD through another label? Was cost
the only factor or other reasons lead
you to your cooperation with Metal
Mind?
Metal Mind has got
experience producing and releasing
DVDs, so we were happy to leave that
to them.

Although
there is a growing interest in UK
in the prog-rock field (note: I do
not know if you agree with that, you
are the one who lives it), still looks
like you, Threshold in the past, Galahad
or other bands have chosen to release
your works under your own labels.
Doesn't this discourage you
at times to see a whole scene to strive
by its own means?
Not especially. There
are benefits to setting up your own
label. You can keep artistic control
over the album and the direction of
the band. If the album sells well,
then everyone concerned gains well.
Also, the band will get a much larger
amount of effort put into it's
future…. Less budget perhaps…
but more heart and soul..;)
Do you think
that the line-up stability has lead
you to excellent releases, such as
"Immortal?", "Contagion"
and "Pepper's Ghost"?
Maybe it has…
I really don't know.
In the DVD
and particularly in the interview
section, Clive Nolan claims that you
compose music for your own selves,
to satisfy you in the first place.
What happens if you witness a gap
between your perception about the
music and the fans'? What will
follow an album that -perhaps, we
don't have an example as this-
will not be as welcomed as the previous
ones?
So far, this has
not been a problem! I guess if everyone
didn't like the music, we would
have to consider how we went about
things.
Do you think
that compromising to some kind of
standards, even formed by the fans
themselves, can restore faith, improve
sales or whatever beneficial might
be?
It's always
worth listening to reactions of fans
etc, but I don't believe in
‘compromising' the making
of an album.
What happens
with the numerous side-bands and projects
that you take part in? Do you think
that this is a reason for delays in
delivering new albums and probably
you could give more in shorter time?
We choose to take
our time over albums. We do not wish
to bring out a new Arena album every
year… that would be too much.
I think an album release should be
an event.
Before we
close, I would like to ask you what
is going follow the successful "Pepper's
Ghost"? Are there any plans?
We are still kicking
around ideas at the moment, but something
good will emerge! We will be on tour
at the end of May… I hope we
might play some new material even
then!
Dear Clive
thank you again very much for your
precious time. I wish you all the
best.
Many thanks.
|